What is WebP?

Learn everything about WebP format - Googles modern image format offering superior compression for both lossless and lossy images.

The WebP image format explained: how it works, its specs, and when to use it.

WebP

What is WebP?

WebP is a modern image format developed by Google that provides superior lossless and lossy compression for web images, producing files 25-35% smaller than comparable JPG or PNG files.

What Makes WebP Different

WebP is a modern image format developed by Google with one goal: make web images smaller without sacrificing quality, so pages load faster. Its key strength is that it is a single format that does everything the older formats do separately. WebP supports lossy compression (like JPG), lossless compression (like PNG), transparency (like PNG), and even animation (like GIF), all in one file type. That versatility is why it has become a default choice for performance-focused websites.

The savings are substantial. In lossy mode, WebP files are typically 25 to 35 percent smaller than JPG at the same visual quality. In lossless mode, they are around 25 percent smaller than PNG. For a website serving thousands of images, that reduction translates directly into faster load times, lower bandwidth costs, and better Core Web Vitals scores, which is why Google, the format's creator, also rewards it indirectly through page-speed ranking signals.

Technically, WebP's lossy mode is built on the intra-frame compression from the VP8 video codec, predicting blocks of pixels from their neighbors and encoding the difference, while its lossless mode uses a set of transforms and a custom entropy coder. The result reaches the same perceived quality as JPG or PNG using fewer bytes.

Browser Support and the Catch

For years WebP's biggest weakness was patchy support, but that is largely resolved: all current major browsers, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge, now display WebP natively. On the modern web you can use it with confidence. The remaining caveat is older software and legacy browsers, where WebP may not open, which is why production websites typically serve WebP with an automatic JPG or PNG fallback for the small share of clients that cannot display it.

Outside the browser, support is less universal than JPG or PNG. Some older desktop image viewers, email clients, and design tools still do not handle WebP smoothly, so for a file you are emailing or handing to someone on unknown software, JPG or PNG remains the safer choice. WebP shines specifically in its home territory: images delivered on web pages.

When to Use Lossy vs Lossless WebP

WebP gives you both compression modes, and choosing correctly matters. Use lossy WebP (around 80 percent quality) for photographs and complex images, where it replaces JPG at a smaller size. Use lossless WebP for graphics with sharp edges, text, screenshots, and logos, where it replaces PNG, and whenever you need to preserve every pixel. WebP supports transparency in both modes, so a logo can be lossless WebP with a transparent background, smaller than the equivalent PNG.

Should You Convert Everything to WebP?

For a website, converting your images to WebP (with fallbacks) is one of the most effective performance improvements available, often shrinking total image weight by a third with no visible quality change. For images that live outside the web, archives, files you share by email, assets for software that may not support WebP, the universal compatibility of JPG and PNG is still worth keeping. A common workflow is to store masters in PNG or a lossless format and generate WebP copies specifically for web delivery, getting the speed benefit without giving up compatibility elsewhere.

WebP vs Other Image Formats

FeatureWebPJPGPNGAVIF
CompressionLossy & lossless[1]Lossy onlyLossless onlyLossy & lossless
TransparencyYes[2]NoYesYes
AnimationYesNoNoYes
Typical file size25-35% smaller[1]LargerLargestSmallest
Browser supportUniversal[2]UniversalUniversalGrowing
Best forWeb imagesPhotosGraphics, logosNext-gen web

WebP balances small file size and broad support, while AVIF compresses further and PNG remains best for lossless graphics.

Pros and Cons of WebP

Advantages

Superior Compression, 25-35% smaller than JPG at equivalent quality, and 26% smaller than PNG for lossless images.

Supports Transparency, Full alpha channel like PNG, but with much smaller file sizes.

Supports Animation, Can replace animated GIFs with far smaller file sizes.

Wide Browser Support, Supported by all modern browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

Disadvantages

Limited Software Support, Older image editors and desktop software may not open WebP natively.

No Universal OS Support, Windows and macOS require additional codecs to preview WebP in file explorers.

Not Ideal for Print, Designed for screens - not used in professional print workflows.

Newer Format, Some legacy systems and older browsers do not support it.

When to Use WebP

WebP is the best choice for web images where performance and load speed matter.

Web Performance

Smaller images mean faster page loads and better Core Web Vitals scores.

E-commerce Images

Product photos load faster without sacrificing the visual quality shoppers expect.

Web Apps

Ideal for user-uploaded images and any web application where bandwidth matters.

Replacing GIF Animations

Animated WebP files are typically 64% smaller than equivalent GIFs.

References

  1. WebP - Google Developers
  2. WebP image type - MDN Web Docs
  3. RFC 9649: WebP Image Format - IETF
  4. WebP - Library of Congress
  5. WebP - Wikipedia

How to open a WebP file

WebP is a modern image format that provides superior compression for images on the web. Software for working with WebP can be categorized into professional tools, free or open-source applications, web browsers, and built-in operating system utilities. Professional tools cater to users needing advanced editing capabilities, while free/open-source options are suitable for casual users or developers. Browsers and built-in utilities offer quick viewing and basic manipulation without the need for additional installations.

When choosing software for WebP, important factors include feature fidelity, whether the focus is on editing or viewing, cost models, and platform compatibility. Users should consider their export needs, as some applications may only support limited formats. In cases where extensive editing is not required, converting WebP to more widely supported formats like JPG or PNG may be a more practical solution.

Adobe Photoshop 2023

Windows, macOSSubscription

Adobe Photoshop is a leading image editing software that supports WebP files through a plugin. It allows users to view and edit WebP images with high fidelity, making it suitable for professional graphic design. The application can handle complex edits, including layers and adjustments.

Key features
  • Full layer and mask editing
  • Advanced color correction tools
  • Support for smart objects
  • Batch processing capabilities
  • Extensive filter and effects library
Strengths
  • Industry-standard editing capabilities
  • High fidelity for complex images
  • Robust community and support resources
Limitations
  • Subscription model can be costly
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners

Exports to: PNG, JPG, TIFF, PDF, WebP

Best for: Adobe Photoshop is ideal for professionals needing comprehensive editing tools for WebP images.

Visit Adobe Photoshop →

GIMP 2.10.34

Windows, macOS, LinuxFree (GPL)

GIMP is a powerful open-source image editor that supports WebP files natively. It offers a wide range of editing features, making it suitable for users who require flexibility without the cost of commercial software. GIMP maintains a high level of fidelity when working with WebP images.

Key features
  • Extensive image manipulation tools
  • Support for layers and masks
  • Customizable interface and plugins
  • Advanced selection tools
  • Batch image processing
Strengths
  • Completely free and open-source
  • Highly customizable with plugins
  • Cross-platform compatibility
Limitations
  • Less intuitive interface than competitors
  • Performance can lag with large files

Exports to: PNG, JPG, TIFF, PDF, WebP

Best for: GIMP is perfect for users seeking a free, powerful alternative for editing WebP images.

Visit GIMP →

IrfanView 4.60

WindowsFree / Paid

IrfanView is a lightweight image viewer and editor that supports WebP files. It is designed for quick viewing and basic editing, making it suitable for users who need a fast solution without extensive features. IrfanView maintains good fidelity when displaying WebP images.

Key features
  • Basic editing tools like cropping and resizing
  • Batch conversion and renaming
  • Slideshow creation capabilities
  • Support for plugins to extend functionality
  • Image format conversion
Strengths
  • Extremely fast and lightweight
  • Simple interface for quick tasks
  • Batch processing for efficiency
Limitations
  • Limited advanced editing features
  • Windows-only platform

Exports to: PNG, JPG, BMP, TIFF, WebP

Best for: IrfanView is ideal for users needing a fast, straightforward tool for viewing and basic editing of WebP images.

Visit IrfanView →

XnView MP 1.10

Windows, macOS, LinuxFree / Paid

XnView MP is a versatile image viewer and converter that supports WebP files. It provides a range of viewing options and basic editing features, making it suitable for users who need to manage and convert images efficiently. The software maintains good fidelity with WebP images.

Key features
  • Multi-format image viewing
  • Basic editing tools like filters and adjustments
  • Batch conversion and renaming options
  • Metadata editing capabilities
  • Slideshow and contact sheet creation
Strengths
  • Supports a wide range of formats
  • User-friendly interface
  • Cross-platform availability
Limitations
  • Less powerful than dedicated editors
  • Some features require paid version

Exports to: PNG, JPG, TIFF, GIF, WebP

Best for: XnView MP is suitable for users looking for a comprehensive image viewer and converter for WebP files.

Visit XnView MP →